Just to Hurt Mum...
A father who received shared parenting of the children:
1. Left a 14yo and 9yo alone in the home to see his girlfriend regularly.
2. Threatened to deprive them of their mother, if they told.
3. Took all of the furniture out of the house, leaving them with a few clothes and blankets.
4. Is relying on depression as an excuse of his negligence.
In the article, it states:
"Duty solicitor Mark Dollimore said the man was suffering depression, had not felt able to look after his children, and wanted to co-operate as much as he could."
Then why did he go to the Family Court and battle it out for Shared Parenting?
Just to hurt mum
Why would he leave them in such poor conditions?
Just to hurt mum
If he could not have cared for them, why didn't he just phone the mother?
Oh.. that's right, he is busy hurting the mother.
Fact is that the Family Court has been and is continually used as a weapon against mothers resulting in the harm of children.
The people who made the shared parenting laws are bitter angry fathers who wanted the legal power to hurt not only their ex wives, but all mothers through the children. They see them as nothing more than a commodity or a tool to use and spout their hatred for all women.
Through the same charm and wit they used to lure these women into destructive environments, they used to promote this bill.
Hence every mother who goes through this system, is forced to endure the suffering this shared parenting mob inflicted.
The question is not how much suffering every mother can endure knowing that her children are at risk or are being abused and neglected. The question is now, what is the government going to do about it? How long do they have to endure this genocide? How many idiots are they going to listen to before we are heard?
No matter how much you try to bury the truth rather than act, it will not only shine through but be sure there will be justice.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Yes, I agree. The Family court only benefits men and neglect the children and, of course, rule against women. My ex only gives my daughter 158 AUD a month. Do you think she can live with that? is the CSA's fault.
Post a Comment